Document Text Content

PRESERVING MONGOLIAN SOVEREIGNTY AND CULTURE MONDAY, JUNE 19, 2017 The sovereignty of Mongolia is under siege. The People’s Republic China (PRC) regards Mongolia as its “Ukraine” i , ii . Covertly the PRC has ambitions not simply to make Mongolia a client or puppet state, as it was under Soviet domination, but to integrate it with the PRC through a “voluntary” referendum, just as the Russians engineered the assimilation of Crimea in 2014. This was Mao Tse-tung’s prophecy and intent once China could establish parity or surpass Soviet military and economic might. iii As the world’s attention is focused on China’s South China Sea claims, an asymmetrical war is also being conducted by the PRC to achieve Mongolian assimilation. Russian influence is being marginalized, as are Mongolia’s ‘3 rd Neighbor’ partners such as Japan, South Korea, Germany, and the US iv . China’s penetration and Sinification of Mongolia’s natural resources, financial system, businesses, infrastructure, media, social media, culture, religion, security, electoral system, and political body are each battle fronts in a multi-pronged asymmetrical campaign to isolate and then assimilate Mongolia v . Preserving Mongolian sovereignty demands a global awareness of the PRC’s covert intent. An education campaign is needed both within Mongolia and globally to counter a) the PRC’s revisionist historical justification for claiming Mongolia as their Crimea vi and b) the PRC’s effort to isolate Mongolia and control all aspects of Mongolia’s economy, resources, politics, and culture. Without a counter-campaign Mongolia will in a decade’s time be assimilate and Sinicized like Inner Mongolia and Manchuria vii . Mongolians will become strangers in their own land. China’s assimilation of Mongolia will not only be a tragedy for the Mongolian people and the hope for Central Asian democracy, but a threat to the balance of power in Eurasia. i In negotiations in 1956 between the Soviets and the PRC, the Soviet negotiator, Sergo Mikoyan, and CCP Politburo member Liu Shaoqi and Premier Zhou Enlai, the Chinese hoped to connect the granting of Mongolia independence with the question of Stalin’s “mistakes.” The Chinese requested the Soviets cancel Mongolia independence in the wake of Khrushchev’s condemnation of Stalin’s personality cult. Liu Shaoqi drew a parallel between Mongolia and Ukraine. He declared that Mongolia was China’s “Ukraine”. Source: “New Documents on Mongolia and the Cold War” by Sergey Radchenko, Wilson Center Cold War International History Project Bulletin, Issue 16, page 343 and Document 1, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/CWIHPBulletin16_p4_1.pdf. ii In 26 February 1989 Deng Xiaoping in a revealing complaint to President Bush showed enduring Chinese views on Mongolia in regard to how Stalin had stolen or severed Mongolia from China. “Memorandum of Conversation between George H. W. Bush and Chairman Deng Xiaoping in Beijing”, Wilson Center, February 26, 1989, http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/116507.pdf?v=9e009d7beac46b3b33fcaafd3bcd08f5. iii On 2 September 1964 during Mao’s talk with the Japanese group of socialists, Mao announced that much of Siberia and Far East once belonged to China: “About a hundred years ago the area of to the east of Baikal become the territory of Russia and from then on Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, Kamchatka and other points are the territory of the Soviet Union. We have not yet requested settling this account!” The publisher of the article writes that Mao makes this claim based on “the fact that many hundreds of years ago Chinese troops came to these areas and that once the Chinese Emperor collected tribute from the local people. Sournce: “In connection with Mao Tse-tung’s talk with a group of Japanese socialists”, Novosti Press Agency Publishing House, 2 September 1964, page 9 and 20, https://ia801207.us.archive.org/0/items/MaosTalkWithJapaneseSocialists/Maos%20Talk%20with%20Japa nese%20Socialists.pdf. iv “Battered Mongolia faces make-or-break moment” by Ken Koyanagi, Financial Times, 5 February 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/36b059b4-ea10-11e6-893c-082c54a7f539. v “China-Mongolia Relations: Challenges and Opportunities” by Zolzaya Erdenebileg, China Briefing, 6 January 2017, http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2017/01/06/china-mongolia-relations.html. vi Throughout history, Han Chinese have only controlled Mongolia for less than 18 months and that military effort was, ironically, financed by the Imperial Japanese Army. vii “Inner Mongolia has become China’s model of assimilation” by Hohhot and West Ujimqin, The Economist, 1 June 2017, http://www.economist.com/news/china/21722853-chinese-mongolians-are-still-asserting-theiridentity-inner-mongolia-has-become-chinas-model.
← Back to search
Blog|

Mongolia Sovereignty Summary_Final.pdf - Epstein Files Document HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029427

Document Pages: 2 pages

Document Text Content

This text was extracted using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) from the scanned document images.

Mongolia Sovereignty Summary_Final.pdf - Epstein Files Document HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029427 | Epsteinify