Document Text Content
From: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 10/31/2011 10:50:46 AM
To: Katherine Keating
Subject: Re: After Words
where are you?
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Katherine Keating -___________________________ wrote:
Dear Friends,
I wanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book 'After Words'. He truly is
an inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was
launched yesterday in Sydney. I will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read.
I trust this email finds you well.
Kindest regards
Katherine X
Creativity is central to our endeavours
• BY:PAUL KEATING
• From:
The Australian
• October 22, 2011 12:00AM
Paul Keating is aware that many people see him as a puzzle and contradiction. During the
interview he explained he wrote this introduction to his book as a guide to help people see the
unifying philosophy of his life, public and private.
FRIEDRICH Schiller, the German philosopher, said: "If man is ever to solve the problems of politics in practice he
will have to approach it through the problem of the aesthetic, because it is only through beauty that man makes his
way to freedom."
Romantic and idealistic as that view may seem to some, the thought is revelatory of the fact that the greater part of
human aspiration has been informed by individual intuition and privately generated passions, more than it has
through logic or scientific revelation. The moral basis of our public life, our social organisation, has come from
within us - by aspiration and by light, not by some process of logical deduction.
Immanuel Kant referred to our inner impulses as "the higher self", an unconscious search for truth, going deeply
into ourselves to establish who we are and what we should be.
Beauty is about the quest for perfection or an ideal, and that quest has to begin with aesthetic imagination -
something informed by conscience, carved by duty. Kant called it "the inner command", the ethical construct one
creates to guide one from within.
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029663
But we need tools to mine good intentions: inspirations, ones which await the creative spark, the source of all
enlargement. Creativity is central to our progress and to all human endeavour.
Music provides the clue: unlike other forms of art, music is not representational. Unlike the outcome of the
sciences, it was never discoverable or awaiting discovery. A Mahler symphony did not exist before Mahler created
it.
E.T.A. Hoffman, a contemporary of Beethoven's, famously said: "Music reveals to man an unknown realm, a world
quite separate from the outer sensual world surrounding him, a world in which he leaves behind all feelings
circumscribed by intellect in order to embrace the inexpressible."
This is not to turn our back on reason. Or to argue that modernism, with all its secular progress through education,
industrialisation, communications, transport and the centralised state, has not spectacularly endowed the world as
no other movement before it. But a void exists between the drum-roll of mechanisation with its cumulative power of
science and the haphazard, explosive power of creativity and passion. Science is forever trying to undress nature
while the artistic impulse is to be wrapped in it.
While these approaches are different - perhaps often diametrically opposite - they inform related strands of thinking
in ways that promote energy and vision.
This is what I have found when these forces are contemplated in tandem. When passion and reason vie with each
other, the emerging inspiration is invariably deeper and of an altogether higher form. One is able to knit between
them, bringing into existence an overarching unity - a coherence - which fidelity to the individual strands cannot
provide.
In the world I have lived in, the world of politics, political economy and internationalism, the literature exists in
abundance. But what is far from abundant are the frameworks for the intuitive resolution of complex problems that
require multi-dimensional solutions.
But from where do we glean this extra dimensionality?
For me, it has always been from two sources: policy ambition in its own right and from imagination - the dreaming.
Policy ambition arising from Kant's higher self, and imagination promoted by those reliable wellsprings - music,
poetry, art and architecture - blending the whole into a creative flux.
This collection of speeches reflects many of those interests and impulses - whether it be Joern Utzon's Opera
House or the imperative of liberal internationalism in foreign policy or Neoclassicism, the future of native title or the
rise of China. Each is related in a wider construct which is part and parcel of the way I have viewed and thought
about the world.
While the speeches are from the period after my prime ministerial life and period in government, the impulse in
writing them came from the same framework and inclinations which informed my life in public office.
The speeches may be read individually or read together, subject to subject, idea to idea. Either way, a common
thread informs them all.
I trust this might be evident to the reader.
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029664
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/creativity-is-central-to-our-endeavours/story-fn59niix-
1226173494033
Paul Keating explains as never before
BY:PAUL KELLY, EDITOR-AT-LARGE
• From:The Australian
October 22, 2011 12:00AM
WITH his panoramic view of world affairs sharper than ever, Paul Keating blames the current global crisis
on blunders by European and US leaders and warns that Australia must rediscover the keys to national
success.
Interviewed in his Sydney office, furnished in a style he calls "the last gasp of revolutionary classicism", Keating's
new 600-plus page book sits atop his desk, an insight into his intellectual, aesthetic and political obsessions.
What has Keating been doing since he left office in 1996? He has been travelling, speaking and analysing the
world and Australia with undiminished intensity suggesting a man operating as prime minister-in-exile.
His idea of leadership is more philosophical than ever, more distant from Bob Hawke or John Howard. His focus is
the synthesis between beauty and reason and his book encompasses China's currency, the world malaise,
Mahler's Symphony No2 and broaching the republic with the Queen.
During the interview Keating talks, as never before, about his leadership concept. But he
is doing something else: explaining himself to a still puzzled nation.
"The great changes in civilisation and society have been wrought by deeply held beliefs
and passion rather than by a process of rational deduction," Keating tells me. In
retirement, his political inspiration comes from music and beauty, not opinion polls.
There are signs he has mellowed. While ruthless with his judgments Keating is keen to
support a struggling Labor Party while addressing the source of its strategic demise.
"The failure of the Rudd and Gillard administrations is the lack of an over-arching story,
the lack of a compelling story," he says when interviewed last week.
"I'm happy that Labor took us through this dreadful financial crisis so competently. But
they are not in the business of teaching. And governments, to succeed with change, must
be in the business of educating the community.
"Our Labor governments have failed to conceptualise the changes. We need a
framework.
"What is the framework? It is 'Australia in Transition' strategically and economically.
That's the story we have to present.
"I think the Australian people are very conscientious. During the 1980s and 1990s we
proved they will respond conscientiously to necessary reforms. They mightn't like them
but they'll accept them. But reforms have to be presented in a digestible format.
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029665
"I know that in the age of the internet, opinion and perpetual static it is difficult to get the
message over. I accept that. But the big messages have their own momentum. If we get
the story of transition right then other things will find their place.
"Our problem is what I call shooting-star policies. We have a policy on carbon pricing, on
minerals, on boatpeople, but they are not connected up to the big picture about
Australia's direction and its transition."
Pressed on whether he thinks the Australian Labor Party is in permanent decline, Keating
defends Labor, insists it doesn't have to decline but highlights the problem. "Labor must
recognise what it has created," he says, invoking the Hawke-Keating era. "It has a
created a new society and it has to be the party of the new society.
"It can't be the party of part of the old society. Labor must be the party of those people
who gained from the pro-market growth economy that we created. Labor must be open to
the influences of this middle class, to people on higher incomes. And I don't think it is."
It is, perhaps, the clearest statement of Labor's problem. The party, in an act of strategic
folly, abandoned the path of its previous success. It turned inwards on itself, away from
the community.
"At the operating level it's become the party of insiders," Keating says. "The problem is
that members get too caught up in the gift of faction managers and they get caught up in
the false construct of popularity, the false god."
Fixated by the nature of political leadership, Keating's book After Words shouts out: "The
great curse of modern political life is incrementalism."
Leaning across the table he says to me that briefing notes and economic texts aren't
enough: the leader must locate his own source of higher command and inner belief. He
laments the efforts of US President Barak Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel
in the teeth of contemporary challenges.
"There is nothing preordained about American decline any more than the European
project is destined to fail," he writes.
"But the portents are not good. Despite the rhetoric, President Obama conducts himself
as an arbitrator or mediator between the competing strands of American economic and
political ideology. He repeatedly eschews striking out, snatching the naked flame and
hanging on. But the cost of this strategy is not simply a cost to him; it is a cost to the
whole world.
"On the other hand, Chancellor Merkel is the archetypal worry-wart. She does not lead;
she assesses.
"You really wonder why leaders want these jobs when they really do not want to lead.
And what is their risk? That Barack Obama will not get a second term? Or that Angela
Merkel's coalition might finally end up on the rocks? If they actually made the leap they
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029666
might astound themselves. Because, in the end, everyone in political life gets carried out
- the only relevant question is whether the pallbearers will be crying."
For Keating, the 20th-century leader exerting most influence on the coming century is
China's Deng Xiaoping.
"If you look at the other figures of the century, Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin and Mao, none
will leave the legacy in terms of the 21st century that Deng leaves," he says. "He walked
away from the ideology of the Communist Party just as effectively as Mikhail Gorbachev
walked away from the essence of the Soviet Union."
By 2050 Keating sees a world order with nations in terms of gross domestic product in
this hierarchy: (1) China, (2) US, (3) India, (4) Japan, (5) Brazil, (6) Russia, (7) Britain, (8)
Germany, (9) France and (10) Italy.
The key, however, is that Japan lags a distant fourth behind the top three.
On America, Keating is dismayed by the pivotal change in its outlook after the end of the
Cold War. "When the Berlin Wall came down the Americans cried victory and walked off
the field," he says.
"Yet the end of the Cold War offered the chance for America to develop a new world
order. It didn't know what to do with its victory. This at the moment the US should have
begun exploiting the opportunity of establishing a new world order to embrace open
regionalism and the inclusion of great states like China, India and the then loitering
Russia.
"Well, frankly, the US didn't have the wisdom. It just wanted to celebrate its peace
dividend. The two Clinton terms and the two George W. Bush terms, that's four
presidential terms, have cost US mightily."
For Keating, the malaise in US politics is the problem. He says: "The most compelling
thing I've seen in years is that in the great burst of American productivity between 1990
and 2008, of that massive increment to national income, none of it went to wages. By
contrast, in Australia real wages over the same period had risen by 30 per cent." Keating
sees this "as the breakdown of America's national compact", the shattering of its
prosperity deal. He says American conservatives abandoned the middle ground
represented by Republican presidents such as Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon and
Bush Sr and became radicals. The derailment, he argues, began under Ronald Reagan
and reached its zenith under George W. Bush.
With the goodwill gone the US "is not able to produce a medium-term credible fiscal
trajectory or get agreement on rebuilding its infrastructure". This paralysis "is significant
not just for the US but for the world."
Keating links the collapse of this "prosperity compact" to the financial crisis. Too many
Americans were unable to sustain themselves from wages and salaries.
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029667
How did they get by? They used the easy credit of the banking system, thereby feeding
the frenzy that ended in bad loans and meltdown.
Keating's book has an abiding message for Australia: in the transformed world we "will
find ourselves increasingly on our own" having to master our own destiny.
The job is to rediscover the productivity and savings agenda of the 1990s. Why did
Australia survive the 2008 financial crisis? "Because of the flexibility of the economy,"
Keating says. "Flexibility which came from the reform of Australia's financial, product and
labour markets that began 25 years ago. This has given us one of the most flexible
economies in the world - arguably the most flexible. But further structural changes are
ahead of us."
He lists them. It is a mix of the new and old Keating agenda: a shift in resources to the
extractive industries; a lift in capital inflow driving a high current account deficit putting a
premium on savings; recognition that competitiveness will lie "in the creativity of our
people as much as it does in our oil and gas"; a renewed emphasis on the value of hi-
tech and education; and above all, a cultural change that integrates Australia more into
East Asia. "Cultural transformation is the key for us," Keating says. He rates it as more
important than economic reform.
"There is less interest now in being part of East Asia than there was in the 1990s," he
laments.
Keating wants this idea revived. And he ties it to the republic arguing that to succeed in
Asia we must become a republic, a proposition Howard always dismissed.
On China, Keating is an optimist yet alive to the daunting economic challenge China now
confronts. "What is happening in China knows no precedence in world economic history,"
he says. "Never before have 1.25 billion people dragged themselves from poverty at such
a pace. China is now half the GDP of the US and incomes have risen by a factor of 10."
He argues, however, that the origin of the 2008 financial crisis lies in the global
imbalances - China has built huge foreign exchange reserves by exporting too much and
America, in turn, is saving too little.
Keating says: "China must shift the basis of growth from net exports and investment to
domestic consumption. Will they achieve this? Probably. Will there be strains along the
way? There have to be."
Unlike many Australian leaders, Keating is a Europhile. "I think the European project is
the most significant project since the second world war," he says. But he sees two huge
blunders made in Europe.
From the euro's inception, Keating said it should constitute only Germany, France and
the Benelux nations, not the peripheral countries around the Mediterranean, and "Greece
should never have been allowed in".
Why were the weaker economies given entry?
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029668
Keating says: "It's because president Mitterrand and the French wanted it. They weren't
ready to sit beside the German unified state without some friends."
So the eurozone was flawed from the outset, a structure awaiting internal assault: "The
problem is we have a single currency without a political union and without a fiscal union."
The second blunder was the 1990s expansion of NATO to the Russian border. For
Keating, this was recklessness for which the world may yet pay.
"Sensible policy would have included a place for Russia in the new world order," he says.
"But that didn't happen. So Russian liberals were pushed to one side by Russian
nationalists. In a sense the US has created Vladimir Putin."
Who is responsible? He points the finger at Bill Clinton.
On the 2008 financial crisis, he says former US Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan
must bear "a fair amount of responsibility".
"Greenspan is someone I know and like," Keating says. "But if you are so naive to believe
that institutions with a balance sheet with assets geared at 45 to one is not an accident
waiting to happen then you don't deserve to be chairman of the Federal Reserve."
He praises Obama for seeking a return to the "liberal internationalism" that, in Keating's
view, made the US great in the post-World War ll age. This is the US he loves but it is still
in retreat.
Asked about the nature of leadership, Keating reveals what lies within his heart: "I believe
there is a poetic strand to life that doesn't exist in an economics textbook.
"This is not to say that rationalism isn't important and good. It is. But left to itself without
the guidance of higher meaning and a higher concept, rationalism can be mean and
incomplete. I say if you simply live on rational policy and briefing notes you are not
sufficiently informed.
"You need a higher calling or some inner system of belief - here I mention Kant and the
inner command that tells you what is true, what is right, what is good. The inner
command must be the divining construct in what you do.
"Music has always been a large part of what makes me tick. You listen to a great work . .
. you hear the majesty of these works and your head and soul gets caught up in them.
When that happens you are in for bigger things and you will strike out to be better.
"When I was listening to music I would always have the pad out to write the ideas down."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/paul-keating-explains-as-never-
before/story-e6frg74x-12261 73493029
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029669
--
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029670