Document Text Content

From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: 5/30/2019 12:32:45 PM To: Michael Wolff________________________________ read the times interview. I would think about pointing to the stormy daniels. denial by trump his staff and aides. would it have made sense to go back to them? no would they admit no did they admit no , did they obfuscate yes. did they deny , yes so checking with the subject when you have to goods only confuses the reader ? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033148
← Back to search
Updates|

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148 - Epstein Files Document HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148

Epstein Files Document Details - Dated 2019-05-30T12:32:45.000Z

Document From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Document To: Michael Wolff________________________________

People Mentioned in This Document

Document Summary

The document is an email from J to Michael Wolff discussing the implications of a Times interview related to Stormy Daniels and the responses from Trump and his staff, while also noting the confidentiality and potential attorney-client privilege of the communication.

People Mentioned

J(from)Michael Wolff________________________________(to)

Document Text Content

This text was extracted using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) from the scanned document images.